What if there was a middle option between retention and abolition that made negative gearing work better? There are multiple ways to improve accountability for this $8 billion-a-year tax concession.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Housing supply
Displaying 61 - 64 of 64 articles
In what looks to be a landmark policy announcement with possible national ramifications, the NSW government has outlined the first phase of a $1 billion fund to develop social and affordable housing.
Allowing first home buyers to tap their super would worsen housing affordability, leave many people with less to retire on, and cost taxpayers in the long run.
Lessons from the sharing economy could provide a housing solution for both buyers and sellers.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Housing Research and Policy, and Associate Director, City Futures Research Centre, UNSW Sydney
-
Emeritus Professor, University of Sydney
-
Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Sydney
-
Professor; School of Economics, Finance and Property, and Director, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Curtin Research Centre, Curtin University
-
ARC Future Fellow & Professor of Economics, Curtin University
-
Executive Dean, UniSA Business, University of South Australia
-
Head of Urbanism and Associate Professor of Urban Studies, School of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney
-
Professiorial Fellow, The University of Melbourne
-
Program Director, Economic Policy, Grattan Institute
-
Senior Lecturer in Urbanism, University of Sydney
-
Professor of Housing Research, University of Adelaide
-
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Hallmark Research Initiative for Affordable Housing, The University of Melbourne
-
Senior Research Fellow, City Futures Research Centre, UNSW Sydney
-
Professor, City Futures Research Centre, Faculty of the Built Environment, UNSW Sydney
-
Professor of Urban Planning, The University of Melbourne
