Australia's behavioral economics unit publishes rather than hides the results of its unsuccessful experiments.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Publication bias
Displaying all articles
Recent reports of dramatic declines in insect populations have sparked concern about an 'insect apocalypse.' But a new analysis of data from sites across North America suggests the case isn't proven.
A new statistical test lets researchers search for similarities between groups. Could this help keep new important findings out of the file drawer?
Some claim that scientists avoid publishing results that go against the consensus on man-made climate change. But this is simply untrue.
We asked three experts for their takes.
Food, drug and other companies often sponsor research in the hope it might produce results favourable to their products. How can we ensure such research remains independent?
Editors of ten authoritative workplace journals amend their publishing criteria to address publication bias.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Cognitive Psychology, UNSW
-
Danny Kingsley is a Friend of The Conversation.
Visiting Fellow, Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University
-
Director of the Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge
-
Assistant Professor of Management & Social Impact, University of Western Australia
-
Chair professor, University of Sydney
-
Senior Lecturer in psychology, Keele University
-
Associate Professor of Biology, Lund University
-
Professor of Biology, Hendrix College
-
Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
-
Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Maryland
-
Professor of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
