Australia supported a phase-out of fossil fuels at the recent UN climate summit but is still expanding coal and gas production. It’s a contradiction that threatens the planet. There is a better way.
Pine grows faster and sequesters more carbon. But native forest is better for biodiversity in the long run. Transitioning between the two offers a win-win solution.
Once the immediate crisis in North Queensland has subsided, authorities will need to grapple with how to deal with the ‘new normal’ of extreme weather events. The big question is: are they prepared?
A wildfire burns a section of forest in the Grande Prairie district of Alberta.
(Government of Alberta Fire Service/The Canadian Press via AP, File)
Current greenhouse gas inventories in Canada only consider “managed” lands. This must change before we can truly understand the scale of Canada’s carbon emissions.
Planting trees on deforested lands in Panama.
Jorge Aleman/Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
It might seem counterintuitive to suggest timber harvesting when the goal is to restore forests, but that gives landholders the economic incentive to protect and manage forests over time.
Children playing on a beach in Vanuatu, an island in the South Pacific Ocean.
Melnais/Stockimo/Alamy Stock Photo
Water shortages are one of the greatest problems created by a warming world. A decentralized water system is a compelling counterargument to the notion that bigger is better.
The deal is a global aspiration, not a legally binding agreement. But it should end the idea that burning carbon – in Australia and elsewhere – can continue on a significant scale beyond 2050.
Seafood is a ubiquitous human food-source, the future stability of which is uncertain.
(Pexels)
Pine Island Glacier passed a tipping point decades ago, and it could do again in the future.
Children and women run in a cloud of dust at the village of El Gel, Ethiopia. Climate change has pushed the Horn of Africa into a catastrophic drought.
Photo by EDUARDO SOTERAS/AFP via Getty Images)