Despite predictions, the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technique didn’t win the Nobel Prize. But with the technology nevertheless taking off, it is time we start having an informed public debate about it.
Academic rigour, journalistic flair
Articles on Gene editing
Displaying 101 - 102 of 102 articles
Until more is understood, it’s sensible to limit experimentation that would make changes to germ line cells that would be passed on to future generations.
Top contributors
-
Deputy Vice-Chancellor Academic Quality and Professor of Molecular Biology, UNSW Sydney
-
Assistant Professor in Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore
-
Associate professor, Queensland University of Technology
-
Geneticist and Group Leader, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University
-
Distinguished Research Professor, Emerita, Dalhousie University
-
Researcher, Lecturer, Attorney, University of KwaZulu-Natal
-
Director of Research and Professor of Pathology, Dalhousie University
-
Shah Rising Star Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, UF Health Cancer Center, University of Florida
-
Visiting Professor in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, University of Melbourne; Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics, University of Oxford
-
Professor of Advanced Technology Transitions, Arizona State University
-
Professor of Chemistry, Connecticut College
-
Doctoral Student in Biochemistry, University of Washington
-
Vanier Scholar and Ph.D. Candidate in Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University
-
Research fellow, The University of Queensland
-
Senior Lecturer, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne
