Citizens from New Zealand, the US, the UK and Canada will all be allowed to serve in the Australian Defence Force. Some of the early concerns are unfounded.
Rigor académico, oficio periodístico
Artículos sobre Military ethics
Mostrando 1 - 20 de 22 artículos
The use of drone strikes raises a host of ethical issues. US military chaplains − the armed forces’ moral conscience − have questions.
Members of the military take an oath before service, but it’s to the Constitution, not a specific person. West Point professors explain how young officers learn the importance of their allegiance.
Just-war theory insists that civilians are not legitimate targets. However, civilian immunity does not provide blanket protection from harm.
Proportionality requires that lives of civilians on both sides of a conflict must be treated with the same degree of respect.
Over centuries, theory on just war has developed six main criteria for assessing conflicts.
Deeper levels of comprehension are needed to understand the embedded inequalities and misconducts in the Canadian Armed Forces.
The US military can exempt from service those who are religiously or morally opposed to violence. But conscientious objector status won’t help soldiers who disagree with specific lawful orders.
There is a long line of military heroes who had the moral courage not to follow immoral orders. In the days ahead, some may have to consider what exactly their oath to the Constitution requires.
No ‘blue wall of silence:’ A military lawyer explains why the US armed forces take accountability and justice seriously.
Letting bad behavior go unpunished can undermine respect for the law of war.
South African soldiers reported that environmental education and training programmes instilled environmentally friendly behaviour in them.
Framing cyberspace as a national security concern can quickly erode fundamental human rights.
Whether as soldiers, suicide bombers or human shields, children are an increasingly common sight on the battlefield.
Maybe you think neuroscience has a peaceable history of benign efforts to improve lives and enhance human capacities. But its origins and development tell a different story – with ethical implications.
The rules on armed conflict on Earth are a major source of restraint on military operations. But the rules on the use of weapons in outer space are far from clear. We need to change that.
Can a Czech soldier justify assassinating a Nazi leader when he knows that it could lead to thousands of innocent citizens being murdered in revenge? If so, how?
Should we allow innocents to be harmed for the greater good? Eye in the Sky puts a modern spin on a classic philosophical moral dilemma.
The moral and ethical dilemmas of future warfare are depicted in this tight British thriller. But what will happen when humans become more removed from the weapons of war?
Why hasn’t the American Psychological Association prohibited members from participating in interrogations? And what are future psychologists learning about military medical ethics?
Principales colaboradores
-
Lecturer in Law, University of Southern California
-
Associate Lecturer, University of Notre Dame Australia
-
Emeritus Professor of International Law, Western Sydney University
-
Senior Lecturer in Applied Ethics, UNSW Sydney
-
PhD, National Security College, Australian National University
-
Professor of Psychiatry and Medical Ethics, Baylor College of Medicine, Harvard University
-
Professor in Political Theory, Durham University
-
Professor of Law, University of Adelaide
-
Full Professor, Former Director, Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University
-
Assistant Professor of International Relations, Rutgers University - Newark
-
Assistant Professor of International Studies, Indiana University
-
Post Doctoral Research Assistant, Edge Hill University
-
University Lecturer and President of the International Association for Military Geosciences, Stellenbosch University
-
Lecturer, Curtin University
-
Assistant Professor of American Politics, United States Military Academy West Point
