My research found at least 60 instances of hate speech in a two-month span last year targeting presidential hopefuls.
Disiplin ilmiah, gaya jurnalistik
Artikel-artikel mengenai X (formerly Twitter)
Menampilkan 21 - 40 dari 727 artikel
Corporate and political actors know more about how our minds work than we do. The right to free thought can no longer be our ‘forgotten freedom’
Nine years after the attacks, a look back at why the hashtag was so successful.
New research shows that scrolling through Instagram can effect our processing and language capabilities. Listen to The Conversation Weekly podcast.
Disinformation campaigns often use a set of rhetorical devices that you can learn to spot, like conspiracy narratives, good versus evil framing, and revealed secrets.
Research explains how to handle the kind of online ‘firestorm’ that X (formerly Twitter) owner Elon Musk is currently experiencing.
Hate is for the haters. Much of the thrill of posting toxic messages can come from the attention and social approval a poster gets from like-minded people.
Social media platforms are abandoning news – which is bad news for traditional media organisations that have come to rely on them for consumers.
The Supreme Court will hear five cases this term that will examine the nature of online discussion spaces run by social media platforms.
Deceptive content on social media is being monetised by digital platforms, advertisers, and influencers
Our study found abstaining from social media led to a reduction in positive emotions.
The chatbot has been released to a small group of testers and some of X’s Premium+ subscribers – many of them have shared their initial thoughts.
Even people with years of relevant training can’t always tell whether social content is evidence-based and trustworthy. We need a better approach for communicating research.
Whatever approach you take to managing your feeds, remain cautious and sceptical.
Some see Elon Musk as an idiot savant; others think of him simply as an idiot. How did an unelected citizen come to wield such power?
Algorithms have been blamed for dividing society. What if they could support social cohesion instead?
With identity the most lucrative commodity social media platforms trade in, their fetishization of authenticity remains ironclad.
In the days of online bulletin board systems, community members decided what was acceptable. Reviving that approach to content moderation offers Big Tech a path to legitimacy as public spaces.
It’s a year since Elon Musk took charge of Twitter. His plan for charging new customers looks like another mis-step.
Social media is a lifeline for community radio, helping it grow by being shaped by young listeners.
Kontributor teratas
-
Professor, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology
-
Professor of Information Systems, Michigan State University
-
Director of UWA Centre for Software Practice, The University of Western Australia
-
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Queensland University of Technology
-
Assistant Data Analyst, Queensland University of Technology
-
Head of Centre for Professional and Economic Development, University of Chester
-
Associate Professor, Queensland University of Technology
-
Senior Lecturer in Applied Ethics & CyberSecurity, Griffith University
-
Professor of Media Industries, University of Nottingham
-
Senior Lecturer in Marketing, University of Hull
-
Professor of Informatics and Computer Science, Indiana University
-
Associate Vice President for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Clemson University
-
Professor of Strategic Management, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick
-
Professor of Formal Philosophy / Director of Center for Information and Bubble Studies, University of Copenhagen
-
Professor of Digital Communication, Queensland University of Technology
